POPULATION ESTIMATES OF NATIVE FRESHWATER MUSSELS IN POOL 5 OF THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER, 2006 Mike Davis1, John Kern2, Teresa Newton3, and Brian Gray3 1Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Lake City, MN 55041. 2Kern Statistical Services, Inc., Sauk Rapids, MN 56379. 3U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WI 54603. During summer 2005, water levels in Pool 5 of the Mississippi River were held about 0.5 m below historically targeted levels to reestablish plant communities. Native freshwater mussels living in the dewatered areas were stranded, resulting in substantial, but inadequately measured, mortality. To better understand the possible adverse effects of this management action on freshwater mussels, we conducted a mussel survey during summer of 2006. Our objective was to obtain pool-wide relative density and population estimates for mussels, stratified by depth. We used a systematic grid with multiple random starts to provide an unbiased estimation of the total number of mussels within each zone of interest. The shallow water zone was all depths 0-0.5 m, including the areas dewatered in 2005, and the deep water zone was all depths >0.5 m. Samples were allocated more densely in the shallow zone (1 sample per 5 ha), than in the deep zone (1 sample per 13 ha). Two 0.25m2 total substrate samples were obtained at each of 359 sites. All live mussels were counted, measured for shell length, aged (if < 10 yrs), and the number of attached zebra mussels was recorded. A total of 669 live mussels, representing 16 species, were obtained. Abundance ranged from 0 to 13 live mussels per sample, with 66% of the samples containing no mussels and 6% of the samples containing >= 5 mussels. Five common species (Amblema plicata, Obliquaria reflexa, Fusconaia flava, Quadrula pustulosa, and Utterbackia imbecillis) accounted for 90% of the mussels. Pool- wide population estimates are forthcoming. High-density sites identified during this survey will be targeted for additional research in the future. Keywords: mussel survey, systematic sampling, population estimate, pool 5